By Sarah Gutsche-Miller
Dance history has some deeply entrenched myths. One is that ballet has always been an aristocratic art form, created and performed for the elite in Europe’s foremost opera houses. Another is that ballet nearly disappeared in France at the turn of the twentieth century, saved only by the timely appearance of Sergei Diaghilev’s Russian ballet in 1909.
While I initially accepted the first myth, I had long been puzzled by the second. I had learned in my undergraduate music history classes that Diaghilev first came to Paris with an exhibit of Russian art, and that he returned with a series of Russian concerts and then a Russian opera. In 1909, he took Paris by storm with a season of Russian ballet. Parisian audiences were enthralled and clamoured for new, more exotic, more Russian productions, and so the Ballets Russes was born. But if Diaghilev found such a vast ballet-loving audience in Paris, surely Parisians knew something about ballet. And if in 1909 Parisians were the ballet aficionados that they were fabled to be, what productions did they see as points of comparison?
Convinced that Parisians must have been creating some ballets of worth, I headed off to research late-nineteenth-century ballet in Paris. Like everyone before me, I began by studying the repertoire of the Paris Opéra. I quickly determined that the history books had accurately portrayed the period as one of decline and decadence. Between 1870 and 1909, the Opéra produced very few and mostly lacklustre ballets that did reveal a stagnation of French dance. As it turns out, however, the Opéra was far from being the only venue to stage ballet at the turn of the twentieth century. What I found instead was a vibrant ballet culture that took place where I least expected it: in the city’s trendy new music halls.
Between 1871 and 1913, Parisian music halls staged roughly four hundred ballets, more than half of which were produced by the city’s three most famous venues: the Folies-Bergère, the Olympia, and the Casino de Paris. At the turn of the century, all three were variety theaters that presented nightly programs of circus and acrobatic routines, song and dance acts, and performing animals, along with at least one ballet or other theatrical production such as an operetta or pantomime. Although now remembered almost exclusively for variety acts such as Little Tich, La Belle Otéro, or the Sisters Barrison, at the time, the halls were at least as celebrated for their ballets. My book, Parisian Music-Hall Ballet, 1871-1913 (University of Rochester Press), brings this popular dance culture to light.
Folies-Bergère program, 20 November 1898. |
R. Lamy, drawing on the cover of Charles Hubans, Valse Brillante from Les Abeilles [c.1877]. |
F. Appel, Folies-Bergère poster for Marine, 1890. |
Paradoxically, while music-hall ballets were created as entertaining ephemera, they had a profound impact on Parisian dance culture and played a significant role in the renewal of French ballet. Not bound by the strictures of classical ballet, music-hall authors and choreographers introduced novel approaches to the genre, fostered a more flexible notion of what “ballet” could be, and cultivated an audience that could appreciate choreographic innovation: the same audience that flocked to see the Russian ballet in 1909. By looking to new sources of inspiration and drawing on the most successful trends in popular art and entertainment, music-hall authors, composers, and choreographers created works with an originality and flair not seen in Paris for decades. These artists and entrepreneurs infused the genre with a vitality long lost at the state theater and brought ballet into the twentieth century.